Why do Mormons support Israel?

In 2003 I studied at Birzeit University in the occupied West Bank of Palestine. It was shocking to experience life under Israeli Occupation and to see the difficulties under which Palestinians must live. I was quickly disturbed when thinking back to conversations I had had with so many people back in Utah who were supportive of Israel’s occupation of Palestine and of the wars the Israelis  have so often fought to maintain the occupation and continue to steal Palestinian land. However, it is somewhat natural for many Latter-Day Saints (LDS), who have a limited understanding of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, to support the state of Israel. A superficial reading of the prophecies in the Bible, as mentioned in Ron Madsen’s recent post (Mormon Cheerleaders for Israeli Tanks), as well as learning about the horrors of the holocaust in school growing up, creates a natural affinity for Jews amongst LDS. Of course we should have sympathy for the Jewish people, but this should not translate into support for Israeli government policies, which are two different things. Additionally, anyone who reads the western press or watches the news (which of course all American LDS do)only learns about the conflict from the Israeli/US governments’ perspective. In fact I was passively supportive of Israel myself growing up. However, when LDS learn more details about the conflict, my experience is that they are quick to realize that in this case the Israelis are the oppressors, and the Palestinians are victims of Israeli aggression, just as I revised my views after seeing the occupation for myself. Prophecies of the gathering cannot justify confiscating Palestinian land and driving Palestinians from their homes by force so that the land can be used for Jews only, let alone bombing defenseless people and starving them to death through an economic blockade, as is currently happening in Gaza. This behavior is antithetical to the foundational teachings of Christianity, which requires that we love our neighbors and treat everyone kindly. I think the BYU Jerusalem Center is helping many Latter-day Saints understand the conflict better and to realize that supporting political Zionism is not consistent with the Gospel. When students go there they see something of the reality and my sense is that most of them revise the views they held previously. Hopefully this process will continue and more and more LDS can become advocates for ending the occupation. On a side note, Elder Bruce R. McKonkie noted in Mormon Doctrine that the State of Israel was not the fulfillment of biblical prophecies of the gathering, and former Church President Howard W Hunter was a supporter of the Palestinians.

About The Mormon Worker

The Mormon Worker is an independent newspaper/journal devoted to Mormonism and radical politics. It is published by members of the LDS Church. The paper is modeled after the legendary Catholic Worker which has been in publication for over seventy years. The primary objective of The Mormon Worker is to meaningfully connect core ideas of Mormon theology with a host of political, economic, ecological, philosophical, and social topics. Although most contributors of The Mormon Worker are members of the LDS church, some are not, and we accept submissions from people of varying secular and religious backgrounds. The opinions expressed in The Mormon Worker are not the official views of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In solidarity, The Mormon Worker View all posts by The Mormon Worker

5 Responses to “Why do Mormons support Israel?”

  • Grégoire

    Thank you so much for posting this. I have always wondered why Latter-Day Saints were so adamant about supporting Zionism.

    In 1990 or 1991 (can’t remember) some Israeli government bureaucrat spoke at the University of Utah or SLCC (can’t remember which). I noted at that time that I was the only person who wasn’t wild with joy at the end of his speech, giving him a standing ovation. It was as though The Beatles had been resurrected and had come to town for their reunion concert.

    I don’t want to comment on religion in depth as I’m the minority here, but I became convinced at that time that it wasn’t strictly a religious issue. I had friends in attendance with me who were atheist/agnostic types and non-Mormons, and they seemed equally enthusiastic. It might be more of a Utah cultural artifact, with all the linguistic ties (words like Zion, Israel, etc. seem to have a dual meaning, and even if one isn’t religious she instinctively identifies with these things).

    I also differ with most of you guys, I think, in that I see the initial foundation of Israel (even the ‘terrorist’ attacks such as the one on the King David Hotel) as a legitimate national liberation/anti-colonial movement. I think it’s important not to conflate the Israeli struggle for self-determination with the oppression of their neighbors once Israel became the colonizer. That’s what the apologists do, so in doing so I think we might just enter the other side of an illegitimate dialectical argument, giving weight to their assertions of legitimacy today — and there is no legitimacy in what’s being done today.

    Gee, I posted a complete article in the comments field. Sorry about that. I meant to just say *thanks*. So, thanks.

  • Mark

    While I appreciate that your time in the West Bank gave you a good view of the Palestinian perspective on things, it is clear to those of us with a more distant perspective (the 10 thousand foot view that looks at all factors rather than the view on the palestinian ground) that the issue is far more complex than Israel “stealing” palestinian land. All land that Israel has “stolen” came from wars started by arab neighbors determined to destroy the state of israel. They lost. As a result, they lost land. Palestinians have equal responsibility to work for peace, and they repeatedly pass this up, opting for violence instead (see the 2000 camp david offer to arafat). Hamas is explicit in its determination to destroy israel and kill all the jews living there.

    To shy away from supporting israel because you see Palestinian suffering at the hands of the israeli government is extremely short sided. Palestinians must take responsibility for peace themselves, and their leaders have not done so. I think the israeli government is mostly justified in the sometimes excessive security measures it takes towards palestinians. While I feel sorry for palestinian civilians, recent events in the middle east have only strengthened my support for israel as a jewish state. The zion cause is just, palestinians, hamas, iran must work for peace as well, they cannot simply complain that israel acts harshly towards them while simultaneously calling for the destruction of israel. It is a holy land, and needs out support.

  • The Mormon Worker

    Hi Mark
    Thanks for visiting the site. My views come partly from living in the West Bank and partly from studying the conflict in graduate school and doing a lot of reading on my own. I strongly disagree with the assertions you made in the above comment. Israeli expansionism (ie stealing Palestinian land) is at the root of the conflict. For a refutation of your arguments, consider the two articles at the links below. One is by John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, the other is by Norman Finkelstein, formerly of Depaul. Thanks.

    http://www.amconmag.com/article/2009/jan/26/00006/

    http://www.counterpunch.org/finkelstein01282009.html

  • theradicalmormon

    Mark,
    You are sadly misinformed. The Arab countries didn’t start the 1967 wars. Check your history books. Or better yet, see Finkelsteins explanations of the war a few posts down which shows a youtube speech of his in Canada recently.

  • Grégoire

    Dear TRM & Mark,

    see Finkelsteins explanations of the war a few posts down which shows a youtube speech of his in Canada recently.

    That was the most memorable part of his presentation for me. Excellent speech.

    Palestinians have equal responsibility to work for peace, and they repeatedly pass this up, opting for violence instead (see the 2000 camp david offer to arafat).

    Hi Mark, I agree with you on this point. The Palestinian people are controlled by a small oligarchy at the top which has been consistently and horribly corrupted. Note that Arafat was constantly going to his palace in Europe for vacations, for example. Where did this guy get the money for vacations, much less real estate? Why did his wife get 1 million euro a month? The short answer is that he stole this wealth from the people. He was bought and sold by business interests.

    I don’t dislike Yassir Arafat, mind you. He seemed like he tried to do the right thing for a while, but there’s just no denying the figures.

    Like you, I see these peace deals (Oslo, et al) as a sham, which only lull the people to sleep while they’re being exploited. I think there’s plenty of blame to go around, and the first constructive step toward bringing a lasting, real peace in the region is for both Israelis and Palestinians to rise up and throw these bums out. If there were a democratic, socialist government in power in these societies, which was responsible to the working people as a whole, I have no doubt that more violence could be avoided.

    Instead you’ve got corrupt people at the top, and the wars which are periodically declared are merely wars between the Israeli and Palestinian ruling classes.

    Just my view. What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers