Yes, torture is not a bar to becoming a Bishop

16

October 18, 2012 by J. Madson

Today we learn that Bruce Jessen who was critical in designing US torture techniques was appointed a bishop per this news release. Yes its official, you can apparently support and aid a torture regime, in fact help design the very torture techniques, used on thousands and be called a bishop. Smoking, beer, nope. Torture, yeah! Disheartening and maddening. Here are my thoughts on torture from the third print issue of the mormon worker:

Don’t Torture in My Name

On September 13, 2003, Alyssa Peterson tragically ended her life. The third female soldier to die in Iraq since the invasion, Alyssa was a devout Mormon who had served a mission in the Netherlands. Shortly after her religious service, Alyssa volunteered to serve in the military. She was adept at learning languages and was sent to Arabic training school. Alyssa later volunteered to go to Iraq in place of another who did not want to go.

It was about this time in a conference room at the Pentagon that Donald Rumsfeld, frustrated from a lack of good intel, ordered the military to “gitmo-ize the situation” in Abu Ghraib and Iraq. Results of which we have all seen in the photos and videos that emerged from Abu Ghraib. It was in this situation that Alyssa Peterson, then serving in Tal-Afar, Iraq, found herself shortly before her death. We know that “Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners. She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all records of those techniques have now been destroyed. …” After a confrontation with superiors, she was put on suicide watch and assigned to guard a gate. Alyssa “avoided eating with her interrogation team and spent time reading at her desk when she did not have other assignments.” Shortly thereafter, Alyssa was found dead in a field with her service rifle in the grass next to her.

“The reactions to the suicide were that she was having a difficult time separating her personal feelings from her professional duties. That was the consistent point in the testimonies, that she objected to the interrogation techniques, without describing what those techniques were.” We may never know the specific reasons Alyssa ended her life because the government is yet to release her suicide note. What we do know however is that Alyssa who had spent 18 months of her life preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to complete strangers, seeing them as children of God was later placed into a situation where she was asked to treat human beings as objects and torture them. Perhaps she felt as Kayla Williams, a fellow soldier who talked to Alyssa one week before her death and also protested the techniques used at Tal-Afar, when she stated the real problem with such techniques is that it, “made me question my humanity and the humanity of all Americans. It was difficult and to this day, I can no longer think I am a really good person and will do the right thing in the right situation.”

In perhaps an even stranger irony, these techniques she was asked to perform were in part reverse engineered by two Mormons known in the CIA as the “Mormon mafia.” James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen were part of a classified group known as SERE that trained US soldiers to withstand interrogation techniques. Mitchell and Jessen were handpicked to reverse engineer communist interrogation techniques and teach them to CIA interrogators. These techniques included waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and others. It was with the capture of Abu Zubaydah in March of 2002 that Mitchell and Jesse had their first chance to use their “enhanced” interrogation techniques.

Zubaydah was a mess when he was captured. Unable to eat, drink, sit, or control his bowels, the FBI began the process of nursing his wounds. At one point, Zubaydah turned septic and nearly died. While Zubaydah was being treated humanely by the FBI, he revealed one key intelligence detail: the identity of Khaled Sheikh Mohammed. Shortly thereafter, the CIA interrogation team arrived and began the techniques designed by Mitchell and Jessen. Ronald Suskind reported that they strapped Abu Zubaydah to a water-board, threatened him with certain death, withheld medication, bombarded him with noise and lights, and deprived him of sleep. At one point, the CIA had even began construction on a coffin to bury Zubaydah alive. It is no surprise that Dr. R. Scott Shumate, then chief operational psychologist for the C.I.A.’s counterterrorism center, packed his bags and left in disgust after witnessing Mitchell and Jessen’s techniques.

Under these conditions, Zubaydah began to “speak of plots of every variety — against shopping malls, banks, supermarkets, water systems, nuclear plants, apartment buildings, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statue of Liberty.” Never mind that Zubaydah was in fact mentally ill and not the pivotal figure they believed him to be. Zubaydah’s diary he kept for more than a decade had three separate voices: a boy, a young man and a middle-aged alter ego. Dan Coleman, the FBI’s top al-Qaeda analyst, stated, “This guy is insane, certifiable, split personality,” and referring to the CIA stated, “They all knew he was crazy.” Newsweek reported that one FBI agent “was so offended he threatened to arrest the CIA interrogators.”

More revealing is the testimony of John Kiriakou, the CIA interrogator of Zubaydah, who when asked whether he had legal authority for his actions in an ABC news interview stated, “Absolutely. Absolutely. I remember – I remember being told when – the President signed the – the authorities that they had been approved – not just by the National Security Counsel, but by the – but by the Justice Department as well, I remember people being surprised that the authorities were granted.” Zubaydah’s interrogation went on for months and we now know that the hundreds of hours of videotapes of his treatment were destroyed in November, 2005. In the case of Zubaydah we have direct involvement of top government officials, including the president, barbaric forms of torture, and meaningless intelligence from an already mentally ill man. As Suskind writes, “the United States would torture a mentally disturbed man and then leap, screaming, at every word he uttered.”

Soon these same techniques; first used in CIA blacks sites and then used in Guantanamo found their way to Iraq resulting in the atrocities of Abu Ghraib and in the crisis Alyssa Peterson found herself leading to her death. Meanwhile, Mitchell and Jessen got paid more than $1,000 per day plus expenses, tax free, for their overseas work and Mitchell finally purchased his dream house in Florida. It was Aldous Huxley who remarked that “the people who kill and torture and tell lies in the name of their sacred causes… these are never the publicans and the sinners. No, they’re the virtuous, respectable men, who have the finest feelings, the best brains, the noblest ideals.”

Often the discussion surrounding torture concerns its effectiveness. However, there is a much more fundamental discussion that is needed when we address torture. If we assume that torture works, then the decision we must face is whether it is better to suffer a nuclear attack than save human life through morally compromised methods. At what point are we justified in not only killing but torturing another human being for the chance that they might know something that might save lives?

Torture has been used by a variety of unsavory groups and governments in history including our own. From the tormenta de toca (water cure) used during the Spanish Inquisition to elicit confessions, sleep deprivation used by Stalin to elicit confessions, the “VerschärfteVernehmung”or “enhanced interrogation” used by Nazis, and the Khmer Rouge’s use of waterboarding on dissidents. The former Prime Minister of Israel Menachim Begin described his sleep deprivation torture by the KGB as “In the head of the interrogated prisoner, a haze begins to form. His spirit is wearied to death, his legs are unsteady, and he has one sole desire: to sleep… Anyone who has experienced this desire knows that not even hunger and thirst are comparable with it.” One individual who voluntarily submitted to a waterboarding experiment described the complete loss of control and willpower. It was not pain he remarked but “at the time my lungs emptied and I began to draw water, I would have sold my children to escape. There was no choice, or chance, and willpower was not involved.”

In our own history, US soldiers used a primitive form of waterboarding in the Phillipine-American war, “water is poured onto his face, down his throat and nose … until the man gives some sign of giving in or becomes unconscious … His suffering must be that of a man who is drowning, but who cannot drown.” This is the same technique Japanese soldiers used on US soldiers in WWII and were tried as war criminals and one Japanese soldier was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor. This same technique later found it’s way into police stations and military prisons particularly in the south.

In 1926 Mississippi’s highest court, in Fisher v. State, 110 So. 361, 362 (Miss. 1926), ruled a murderer’s confession be overturned because of “the water cure, a specie of torture well known to the bench and bar of the country.” This was based upon an earlier case, White v. State, 182, 91 So. 903, 904 (Miss. 1922), that overturned a murder conviction of a young black man whose hands “were tied behind him, he was laid upon the floor upon his back, and, while some of the men stood upon his feet, Gilbert, a very heavy man, stood with one foot entirely upon appellant’s breast, and the other foot entirely upon his neck. While in that position what is described as the “water cure” was administered to him in an effort to extort a confession as to where the money was hidden which was supposed to have been taken from the dead man. The “water cure” appears to have consisted of pouring water from a dipper into the nose of appellant, so as to strangle him, thus causing pain and horror, for the purpose of forcing a confession. Under these barbarous circumstances the appellant readily confessed.” We should never forget that in the years from the civil war to civil rights, thousands of people were tortured and many killed by our own citizens. In one infamous lynching in Paris, Texas, a crowd of 10,000 men, women, and children took photos, ate popcorn, all the while a black man was tortured and burned alive.

Torture does what the Russian writer Aleksander Solzhenitsyn described in The Gulag Archipelago, it “befogs the reason, undermines the will, and the human being ceases to be himself, to be his own ‘I.’” All of these techniques and methods share the same goal: to break the human will. How should we react as Christians and Mormons to torture?

One of the fundamental values of Mormonism is the idea that God believes in free will and respects each individual soul. Mormons also believe that there was a decision made that free will was more important than using compulsion to prevent countless tragedies whether it was genocide, rape, child abuse, or even the salvation of our eternal souls. If free will is so sacred to God, how can we every justify doing what even God himself will not do: robbing a human soul of its will, its “I am.” It is a basic Christian tenet that we are to love our enemies and do good unto those who hate us. It is not just in the generalities that we are Christian, but in the particularities of turning the other cheek and enemy love. Christ is clear that this is how we become Sons of God. How we treat our enemies is an indicator of our level of discipleship. This says more about our Christianity than any professed creeds or ideas.

There are things more important than saving human life. This is not a question of self-righteous victimhood but an issue of self-preservation. Torture is ultimately about our own personal and national soul. When Peter learned of Christ’s future suffering and death on the cross, he rebuked the Lord and tried to prevent it. It is wise to remember the Savior’s words in response. He reminded Peter that we are to take up his cross and that if there are not boundaries we will not cross even to save our lives, we may lose our very soul. The real question is what will we exchange for our own soul, for our national soul? If we are willing to torture and break another’s will, we may be as worthy of Christ’s rebuke as Peter was, “Get behind me, Satan: you are a scandal to me: for you do not understand the things God, but those of men.”

Before Christ left he promised he would send us the comforter (parakletos). Satan is the accuser. The parakletos is the defender of the accused (Greek for defense attorney, the defender of victims). Jesus was tortured and crucified so that no one else would have to be a victim again. When we torture and when we kill victims, we deny the parakletos, the spirit. This is how we crucify Christ again and deny the holy spirit (the parakletos), the call to defend the accused. Stalin tortured men in the name of Russia, the Inquisition in the name of the church, Hitler in the name of German Nationalism, and our own government tortures in the name of freedom and liberty. At the end of the day, if we torture we are torturers and we deny the power and meaning of the cross.

About these ads

16 thoughts on “Yes, torture is not a bar to becoming a Bishop

  1. JR says:

    How do we reconcile calling as a Bishop a man who developed torture techniques?
    How do we reconcile BYU (and the First Presidency by extension) giving an honorary doctoral degree and General Authorities fawning over the murderer and war criminal Richard Cheney?
    How do we reconcile BYU inviting Zbigniew Brzezinski (cofounder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller) to speak to the impressionable young minds at “the Lord’s University”?
    How do we reconcile the First Presidency authorizing the use of >$1.5B of tithing money to build City Creek Mall, a Babylonian 3-ring circus, right across the street from Temple Square?
    How do we reconcile BYU (and the First Presidency by extension) firing Professor Steven Jones, noted physicist, for the “crime” of publishing hard evidence that thermite and thermate were used in the destruction of World Trade Centers 1, 2, 7 on Sept. 11, 2001?

    I know the Gospel of Jesus Christ is true.
    I know Jesus Christ lives.
    I know the Book of Mormon is true.
    I know Joseph Smith was and still is a Prophet of God.

    I have yet to reconcile these and other actions of the men currently leading the church.
    JR

    • LDSDPer says:

      amen, JR–

    • Ron Madson says:

      JR, well said. How do I reconcile all this? We can point to Mormon 8: 35-39 and say “the BOM is vindicated in that Mormon see us and our doing and prophesies of the very things we are doing, ie, “polluting the Holy Church of God” and then 3 Nephi 16 where the Lord states that in the latter days after the restoration of the fullness that us gentiles would “sin against the gospel.” But yes, we have deeded our allegiance over to the state and the Babylon.

      • LDSDPer says:

        Very true–
        You realize, I am sure, that if *we* speak up about this in SS, etc.–

        we are in peril of being outcast–

        I have remained silent in church–

        I can’t remain silent on the internet–

        I appreciate the time that goes into these blog essays–
        and the heart–

      • Forest Simmons says:

        Don’t forget 2 Nephi 28:14

        14 They wear stiff necks and high heads; yea, and because of pride, and wickedness, and abominations, and whoredoms, they have all gone astray save it be a few, who are the humble followers of Christ; nevertheless, they are led, that in many instances they do err because they are taught by the precepts of men.

        By the way, in this context “whoredoms” refers to whoring after the false gods of power and mammon, i.e. being unfaithful to the Lord.

  2. Interested observer says:

    Amen to all of the above.

  3. Forest Simmons says:

    Man was made in the image of God. Whoever desecrates that image does it unto God. “Inasmuch as you torture one of the least of these, you torture me.”

  4. Mark Schulthies says:

    Appointments to bishop (leadership positions) aren’t inspired as I was taught and lead to believe in the church. This proves the reality making our church the same as every other on the earth in this respect. Human being are running the church. The premise of this article is supposed to shock Mormons but it just confirms what I’ve learned about my church over the 50 years of my life. We are not special, we are just as fallible as the Catholics, Baptists, or any other religion. You’ve a got a choice – tell the truth about who is in the priesthood (human beings) or protect the institution with a falsehood (cover-up or lie). Sadly, we expect more because we have the same false assumption that our church leaders aren’t capable of torture – but the truth is that they are men. Men are corruptable. I know that’s why Christ had to atone for our sins – yes, LDS sins. They are not any worse or better than the next.

  5. T says:

    Powerful post. I am an LDS woman who served in the active duty army and spent almost 3 and a half years in Iraq total. I have always been affected by Alyssa’s story but for reason didn’t know before that she was mormon. I have always been chilled by the possibility that she did NOT kill herself. Heavenly Father knows. Someday all wrongs will be made right. How much better now to stand on the side of right, and always question and use discernment. The Aldous Huxley quote was excellent. Evil has a way of looking respectable, even to the elect. Thanks for the wonderful spirit in your blog and for asking difficult questions that we should all be seeking the answers to as we strive for truth and seek the still small voice.

  6. tariq says:

    D&C 121: 39 — “We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.”

    The anarchists have it right, to be suspicious of all authority. It doesn’t matter how faithful a Latter-day Saint a person is or what his/her position is within the church. Everyone is corruptible. Even nice guys who mow their lawns, go to their kids’ soccer games, and wave hello to their neighbors have the potential to be torturers when under the influence of authority or the will to obey authority. Even me, even you. It is a healthy thing for society to have a few radicals cultivating a little thoughtful disrespect for authority.

    It is extraordinarily frustrating and disheartening, but not surprising, that the Church called a torturer to be a bishop. The sad thing is, it is unlikely that he is the only bishop or stake president in the Church who makes a living from causing harm. There are plenty of other Church authorities who work for the military industrial complex, the CIA, the State Department, etc. who get paid to act like a bunch of Gadianton Robbers.

  7. Forest Simmons says:

    Amen, Tariq, we shouldn’t be too surprised. I worked in helicopter parts supply (tech supply) for my two tours in ‘Nam in the 1st Cav. Even though I have always been grateful for never having to “fire a shot in anger,” I am also aware that we pen pushers were no more innocent than anybody else. We enabled the war machine. And we thought we were doing God a favor by “saving the Vietnamese from Communism,” a life worse than death. “Better dead than red,” etc.

    [Now that "red state" means Republican, I'm tempted to take up this slogan again, in the form "I'd rather be dead than red."]

    T,

    I have been told that men have a greater ability to compartmentalize. On Sunday we promise to always remember Him, but immediately forget Him when the context switches from religion to business, sports, war, etc.

    It’s like the knock knock joke: “knock, knock.” “Who’s there?” “So soon you forget me?”

    Alyssa was like Rachel Corrie, a person of integrity.

  8. Forest Simmons says:

    Among Christians, Mormons have the clearest theological teachings against God being a torturer, Apostate Christian theology teaches that God employs “extraordinary rendition” to “hell” as a form of never ending torture for vast swaths of humanity that were unfortunate in their time or place of birth, therefore predestined to suffer for ever and ever.

    Despite their flawed theology, most sectarian Christians still recognize that torture is wrong, and will not participate in it. Ray McGovern is a great example of a Catholic Christian voice against torture.

    For Romney to say, “We need more Gitmos,” is obscene, and would be grounds for calling his membership into question If I were his bishop.

    In our theology, our torment is the regret we suffer when we think of the pain we caused others and of the opportunities of service that we missed because of selfish reasons. When as a child I asked my mother what hell was, she replied that it is “when the man you become meets the man you could have been.”

    The closest thing to a geographical hell in our theology is “outer darkness” which means being excluded from any kingdom of glory because of a stubborn, unrepentant, anti-social Republican type attitude. It is not a place of torture. The few that end up there are provided with all that they need except that which they think they do not need, community and communion with other humans.

    Joseph received all of this (which I have summarized in my own words) line upon line and precept upon precept. When he received what we now call section 137, he was surprised to find out that his bother Alvin was an heir to the Celestial kingdom, because he had died after the age of accountability but before the restoration of the fulness of the everlasting gospel of Jesus Christ. And this was after section 76, and after section 19, where the first hints of universal salvation were given. More light and truth came in sections 88 and 128, where the doctrine of availability of salvation for all was fully fleshed out.

  9. tariq says:

    Your mother sounds like a wise woman.
    Also, I like the phrase “extraordinary rendition to hell.” I’m gonna steal that one from you.

  10. JR says:

    I am very glad there are sites like this where people of like mind can come together. On other sites any hint of criticism of anyone in the church is met with hurtful and cold comments and no desire to try to understand where you are coming from – they do not want to understand your experiences or see your side of the issue. I am glad to find members who think and feel like I do.( I am not very good at writing and not good at making my points.) Thank you for this site.

  11. “The world always mistook false prophets for true ones, and those that were sent of God, they considered to be false prophets and hence they killed, stoned, punished and imprisoned the true prophets, and these had to hide themselves ‘in deserts and dens, and caves of the earth,’ and though the most honorable men of the earth, they banished them from their society as vagabonds, whilst they cherished, honored and supported knaves, vagabonds, hypocrites, impostors, and the basest of men.”
    (History of the Church 4:574)

    History has a way of repeating itself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 207 other followers

Categories

Archives

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 207 other followers

%d bloggers like this: