Cain’s Mark of Protection

10

January 14, 2010 by J. Madson

A couple of weeks ago, the old Cain curse = black skin myth came up again on this blog. I, for one, am tired of hearing this myth peddled about which besides being racist is not scriptural. Let me explain.

We are told in the scriptural text that Cain tills the land, Abel the flocks. Cain is the older, Abel the younger. Cain and Abel both offer sacrifice and Abel’s is accepted (ie it works) and Cain’s is not. One common argument of scholars is that if you want to know what sacrifice is meant to do, see what happens when it fails. In this instance, Cain’s failed sacrifice results in the death of Abel (or as Rene Girard would explain, sacrifice was meant to prevent the death of another). Now regardless of whether you accept this proposition, lets continue… Cain in turn is cursed, cursed with what? Well, it is not a mark. He is cursed from tilling the earth and to be a wanderer/nomad.

“And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him. And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper? And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground. And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand; When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.” (Genesis 4:8–12)

This is the curse that Cain receives in verse 12: that he will lose the gift of agriculture and he will be a wanderer on earth. Nowhere do we read that the curse consists of a mark or black skin.

What the scriptures do make clear in the next verses, however, is that the mark is a protection for Cain. It is Cain who feels that his loss of agriculture and sentence to be a wanderer is too much of a punishment. He specifically fears that whoever finds him will kill him. Cain protests to the Lord

“Surely You have driven me out this day from the face of the ground; I shall be hidden from Your face; I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth, and it will happen that anyone who finds me will kill me” (Genesis 4:14)

“Behold thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the Lord, and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that he that findeth me will slay me, because of mine iniquities, for these things are not hid from the Lord.” (Moses 5:39)

Note: Cain rightly understands that many will want revenge on him for killing Abel. This is of course part of the mimetic rivalry or revenge cycle. But what is of interest to me is the Lord’s response. The Lord does not pardon Cain; he rightly acknowledges his guilt and Abel’s innocence, but he still protects Cain.

“And the LORD said to him, “Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.” And the LORD set a mark on Cain, lest anyone finding him should kill him.” (Genesis 4:15)

“And I the Lord said unto him: Whosoever slayeth thee, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And I the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.” (Moses 5:40)

It is here that the Lord marks him with a “sign of protection” or if you dont like protection pick another word, but it is clear that the mark is meant to make clear to everyone that Cain should not be harmed. God makes it clear in the text that both murder and this revenge stuff isn’t gonna fly. The mark is self-explanatory in the scriptures and it makes it clear what the mark is for. Sevenfold is not on Cain but anyone who kills him. I think its pretty clear that the Lord is letting everyone know that even though Cain is a murderer and even though we all might think he should be killed, it is forbidden.

Perhaps a better translation will illustrate

“My punishment is too great to endure! Look! You are driving me off the land today, and I must hide from your presence. I will be a homeless wanderer on the earth; whoever finds me will kill me.” But the Lord said to him, “All right then, if anyone kills Cain, Cain will be avenged seven times as much.” Then the Lord put a special mark on Cain so that no one who found him would strike him down” (Genesis 4:13-15)

Not only does the Lord protect Cain with this mark but he lives on to have spouses, children, and found civilization

“And Cain went out from the presence of Jehovah, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.” (Genesis 4:16-17)

Both Cain and Abel offered sacrifice but only the one with blood seemed to be efficacious whereas the one by Cain failed and the ill feelings towards Abel persisted and resulted in death. I have no doubt Cain was complaining but he was truly fearful his life would be taken (as would be expected for revenge on killing Abel) and the Lord apparently understood the same and marked him so that everyone knew Cain was off limits for killing and made a prohibition against murder in general (ie sevenfold).

So in conclusion, there is no scriptural basis for the mark on Cain having any relation to skin color. The mark is rather a mark of protection signaling God’s desire than no revenge be taken upon Cain. I often wonder if many of these myths arise from our own psyche and need to justify our rivalries and hate for others. As Anne Lamotte said, “You have probably created God in your image when He hates all the same people you hate.”

Some questions or thoughts for discussion:

Why does God protect Cain? The scriptures are clear that God does not want anyone to kill Cain and revenge Abel’s death. Why? Why does God prohibit revenge even on the guilty?

What are we to make of Lamech who kills a man for wounding him and a young man for bruising him? Is the pact that Lamech and Cain enter with Satan the very act of killing itself?

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Cain’s Mark of Protection

  1. Kat says:

    I also have been thinking about this particular story quite a bit in the last couple of weeks. I’m in an Iconology course where we are reviewing the Crumb copy of Genesis and with recent statements regarding the Haiti crisis, this has been in my mind. Even if you are a literalist and you believe Cain was marked out with a darkening of the skin, how can you justify racist behaviors? God clearly felt Cain had been punished enough by His own hand. Also, the Noah story comes a bit later on and as Noah is not traditionally cast as a black person, but as a Jewish person, how can the literalist pursue hateful treatment of what is clearly a fellow descendent of the ark crew? What becomes clear is that any attempt to rationalize this irrational hatred through a biblical connection is just one more link in faulty thinking. Any dedicated Christian must reject racism fully in order to fulfill the basic commandments Christ sets forth in the Sermon on the Mount.

  2. Joseph says:

    Interesting thoughts. I had never thought of Cain’s mark as one of protection, but that is what the scripture says. It does seem to be a repudiation of the idea of capital punishment, which was practiced under the Law of Moses (with restrictions), but does not seem to fit into the Gospel of Christ. Certainly it is a rejection of the old mythological hero’s creed of revenge and retaliation that is so much a part of our psyche. I can’t say I have been able to completely overcome that in myself, but the scriptures make clear that we need to.

    I have always referred to the Joseph Smith translation of Moses in my understanding of the Cain figure, as well as being influenced in my understanding by Hugh Nibley. Cain in Joseph Smith’s translation seems to be an important figure in the development of our economic systems: “Truly I am Mahan [or Mind], master of this great secret, that I may murder and get gain” (Moses 5:31). Becoming a descendant of Cain seems to me to have more to do with subscribing to this philosophy than any physical genealogy.

    In terms of Lamech, the Joseph Smith translation of Genesis that we have in the Book of Moses makes clear that there a kind temple ceremony that initiated individuals into Cain’s “murdering to get gain” scheme, and Lamech murdered Irad, who was blabbing about Cain’s perversion of the temple to Adam’s other children, soley for the sake of keeping this a secret.

    I do feel strongly that trying to understand the curse Cain came under in terms of race (for me there is just the human race) misses the point completely.

  3. Martin F says:

    I´m curious, wasn´t the mormon church against black becoming priest up until it became illegal. And only then, through “revelation” they started allowing it.

    • J. Madson says:

      The LDS Church did have a policy of not letting black’s have the priesthood. It was never illegal and many tried to change it before but you are right that it didnt change until a revelation came about. It is in my opinion a real tragedy that so many were denied access to priesthood, temple, and other blessings. The issue is a bit more complex but needless to say, blacks originally could have the priesthood in the church, and it was a combination of racism, ignorance, and an unquestioning attitude, in my opinion, that led to the priesthood ban after Joseph Smith’s death. Most Christian church’s have a very poor history with race in this country.

  4. Forest Simmons says:

    The Lord protecting guilty Cain from death reminds me of what Mormon said about the massacre endured by the People of Ammon.

    Alma 24: 26 And it came to pass that the people of God were joined that day by more than the number who had been slain; and those who had been slain were righteous people, therefore we have no reason to doubt but what they were saved.
    27 And there was not a wicked man slain among them; but there were more than a thousand brought to the knowledge of the truth; thus we see that the Lord worketh in many ways to the salvation of his people.

    In other words,it is a greater tragedy when the wicked die in their sins than when the righteous are slain. Compare also …

    D&C 42: 45 Thou shalt live together in love, insomuch that thou shalt weep for the loss of them that die, and more especially for those that have not hope of a glorious resurrection.

  5. Forest Simmons says:

    I wonder what mark of protection we could put on Clinton, Bush, Obama, and the other war criminals?

  6. Matthew says:

    “Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord.”, answers why Cain was marked. Noah couldnt have been a Jew because he wasnt an Israelite, because he was Israels great great great grandpa. And in conclusion Joseph Smith was a false prophet, Jesus obviously didnt return in 1891, like Mr. Smith claimed would happen, and there was no temple built in Missouri in his life time as he also incredulously prophecied. The Bible is all you need for an instruction manual for truth.

  7. thebusinessfactororg says:

    Cain was protected so he could suffer the punishment that GOD imposed on him. GOD did not want him nor his descenfants to die until they suffered his punishment and repent for it. Remember by killing Abel the dried blood was the identifier …read again. And clearly in the 7th book of Moses it tells you it was the black skin…the same mark that now is on Satan…HE IS BLACK! Clearly in the 7th book of Moses it also details that Enoch would not even attempt to conduct his preachings to the sons of Cain because of the Black Skin…remember there is also the fact that Satan attempted to corrupt the white blood line of Adam Seth with the “black skin blood line” of Cain and he has done it in America since 1967 laws were changed…

  8. Thulani says:

    This is not a thing should be publish. If it was about a color why god look at the color insted of wht cain did. Let us not fool people of wht we think rather than what the bible says. Interpretation of the bible should be taken care of it, not just to assume. I do believe there is no verse says such thing about the cain mark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 260 other followers

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: