Would Utah’s legislature accept climate change if scientists claimed to know it in their hearts?

3

February 16, 2010 by Jason Brown

Utah’s legislature has just passed a non-binding resolution challenging the veracity of anthropogenic climate change. The resolution, passed on February 9th also urges the EPA to drop plans to use its authority to regulate greenhouse gases and calls for no climate change legislation to be passed until another independent study can be conducted. Depending on the day climate critics vacillate between rationalizing climate change as part of earth’s natural cycles and flat out denying that it is occurring at all. Mike Noel, a Republican member of the Utah legislature, is even convinced that attempts to mitigate climate change are a conspiracy to control the world’s population. In anticipation of the resolution, eleven Brigham Young University (BYU) scientists responded with a reasoned and rational point by point response. What is interesting to me is that these professors of science at a religious institution are using the language of scientific rationality in their appeal to Utah legislators. Within Utah’s dominant religious culture, Mormonism, however, scientific knowledge is secondary to the knowledge one can receives from the Holy Ghost which is believed to confirm eternal or sacred truths. So then, why didn’t BYU scientists appeal to this kind of knowledge? That they knew that humans were causing climate change because they felt it in their hearts? That they could not explain it, but that they had prayed about it and the Holy Ghost had testified that it was true, and that we must now act in order to prevent catastrophic consequences.

 If neither the language of science nor the language of testimony would prove sufficient to convince legislators that climate change is real and that humans are causing it, then it is clear that there is something else behind their criticism of climate science. The Utah resolution shows that “science” is only useful in as much as it supports the critics’ desired outcomes. I would assert that no amount of scientific data will convince those hostile to the implications of anthropogenic climate change. Instead of hiding behind the authority of science, doubters of climate change should make explicit their real reasons for opposing action to mitigate the effects of climate change: it threatens the current economic order and does not fit a fundamentalist market ideology that opposes any and all regulation and taxation on business as usual.  

 Those who have suggested that more or better education of Utah legislators will allow them to see the error of their ways, should reconsider the ways in which science is used in the public discourse and politics. What are needed are not more studies, more education, or more patience; what is needed is a fundamental shift in the ways we interact with the earth and define the economic prosperity that has caused climate change to begin with.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Would Utah’s legislature accept climate change if scientists claimed to know it in their hearts?

  1. Joseph says:

    Reading this reminds me of why I’m glad I don’t live in Utah.

    I would tend to agree that any arguments supporting human causes of global warming are futile against people who are determined to maintain the status quo.

    An interesting notion is brought up with this, however. In all my major decisions and approaches to things, I tend to go with the Spirit. I do believe in God, and I believe God sees things that science and the wisdom of humans cannot.

    However, when I go see the doctor for something, I don’t want want that doctor to make a decision based solely on what is in her/his heart. I want an approach that is scientifically sound. I want medicine that has been scientifically tested. It would seem that since the environment is ultimately a health issue, we should be looking to science.

    Ultimately, even if someone were to say they feel in their hearts that global warming is real and human recklessness is causing it (which I do) the people we are talking about here would probably say such a person was apostate. Their main fear is having to change (or in religious terms, repent).

  2. Kate says:

    As someone who has worked in the Utah State Legislature, I can tell you that that place is one of the craziest places I have ever been… like a black hole of reason and logic.

    Want to know what the wild west was like? Go spend an afternoon at the Utah State Legislature.

    That said, it still seems strange to me that people who cannot breathe the air outside without having their children get sick, AND cannot see the mountains that surround their Capitol building don’t want to do something to stop it.

  3. Joseph says:

    I mentioned not living in Utah now, but I did as a child. My main memory from Kindergarten is being in the hospital a long time for pneumonia, so the air has been bad a long time there.

    Of course now, even being outside of Utah, I am unfortunately much too close to a couple of power plants (and a potential 3rd), which has brought back some of my respiratory problems. So I have to admit that in addition to climate change issues, I’d also like to see a clean-up so I and my children can breathe decent air!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 258 other followers

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: