Letter from prison: Climate Prisoner Tim DeChristopher speaks

5

September 2, 2011 by tristan savage

originally posted on Grist and Peaceful Uprising

The following text appeared in a handwritten letter from Tim DeChristopher addressed to Grist’s Jennifer Prediger.

[note: Tim DeChristopher was finally sentenced after years of court delays that hoped to blunt the force of planned solidarity mobilizations. He was arrested and tried for successfully disrupting an illegal federal oil and gas auction -as “Bidder 70”- that was later canceled by the Obama administration]

If I had ever doubted the power of words, Judge Benson made their importance all too clear at my sentencing last month. When he sentenced me to two years in prison plus three years probation, he admitted my offense “wasn’t too bad.” The problem, Judge Benson insisted, was my “continuing trail of statements” and my lack of regret. Apparently, all he really wanted was an apology, and for that, two years in prison could have been avoided. In fact, Judge Benson said that had it not been for the political statements I made in public, I would have avoided prosecution entirely. As is generally the case with civil disobedience, it was extremely important to the government that I come before the majesty of the court with my head bowed and express regret. So important, in fact, that an apology with proper genuflection is currently fair trade for a couple years in prison. Perhaps that’s why most activist cases end in a plea bargain.

Since that seems like such a good deal, some people are asking why I wasn’t willing to shut my mouth and take it. But perhaps we should be asking why the government is willing to make such a deal. The most recent plea bargain they offered me was for as little as 30 days in jail. (I’m writing this on my 28th day.) So if they wanted to lock me up for two years, why would they let me walk for an apology and keeping my mouth shut for a while? On the other hand, if they wanted to sweep this under the rug, why would they cause such a stir by locking me up? Why do my words make that much of a difference?

With all criminal cases, of which 85 percent end in a plea bargain, the government has a strong incentive to avoid a trial: In addition to cutting the expense of a trial, a plea bargain helps concentrate power in the hands of government officials.

The revolutionaries who founded this country were deeply distrustful of a concentration of power, so among other precautions, they established citizen juries as the most important part of our legal system and insisted upon constitutional right to a jury trial. To avoid this inconvenience, those seeking concentrated power free from revolutionaries have minimized the role of citizens in our legal system. They have accomplished this by restricting what juries can hear, what they can decide upon, and most importantly, by avoiding jury trials all together. It is now accepted as a basic fact of our criminal justice system that a defendant who exercises his or her right to a jury trial will be punished at sentencing for doing so. Transferring power from citizens to government happens when the role of citizens gets eliminated in the process.

With civil disobedience cases, however, the government puts an extra value on an apology. By its very nature, civil disobedience is an act whose message is that the government and its laws are not the sole voice of moral authority. It is a statement that we the citizens recognize a higher moral code to which the law is no longer aligned, and we invite our fellow citizens to recognize the difference. A government truly of the people, for the people, and by the people is not threatened by citizens issuing such a challenge. But government whose authority depends on an ignorant or apathetic citizenry is threatened by every act of open civil disobedience, no matter how small. To regain that tiny piece of authority, the government either has to respond to the activist’s demands, or get the activist to back down with a public statement of regret. Otherwise, those little challenges to the moral authority of government start to add up.

Over the last couple hundred years of quelling dissent, the government has learned a few things about maintaining power. Sometimes it seems that the government has learned more from our social movement history than we as activists have. Their willingness to let a direct action off with a slap on the wrist while handing out two years for political statements comes from their understanding of the power of an individual. They know that one person, or even a small group, cannot have enough of a direct impact on our corporate giants to really alter things in our economy. They know that a single person can’t have a meaningful direct impact on our political system. But our modern government is dismantling the First Amendment because they understand the very same thing our founding fathers did when they wrote it: What one person can do is to plant the seeds of love and outrage in the hearts of a movement. And if those hearts are fertile ground, those seeds of love and outrage will grow into a revolution.

Let’s Win! from Alexander on Vimeo.

5 thoughts on “Letter from prison: Climate Prisoner Tim DeChristopher speaks

  1. nat kelly says:

    While I agree with DeChristopher about the importance of civil disobedience, I think he underestimates the extent to which all prisoners are subject to extreme intimidation by the legal system. Every defendant is rewarded for being obsequious, dutiful, apologetic, cowed by authority. Every prisoner will be treated more harshly if they attempt to maintain their own dignity. It is important that activists do not privilege themselves – most prisoners have probably faced deals and treatment very similar to his, regardless of their “offense”.

    • tristan call says:

      true (and I think if you told him so, Tim would agree with you).

    • I’m already sick of this crap. nobody around here gave a damn about pelican bay but when tim has to go to a minimum security prison for two whole years everyone loses their mind. it’s so completely backwards.

      • tristan call says:

        you’re right about this. but I do think it’s worth understanding where people are at. For people already doing serious anti-prison work, Tim’s incarceration is no surprise and perhaps not especially insightful or upsetting compared to others’ situations (unless they know him personally, in which case: come on, we just lost a friend for two years. it’s worth passing around his letters.) But for people that are just figuring out the reality of the incarceration complex, knowing someone that then goes to prison for years and was explicitly told he wouldn’t have to if he just said sorry- that is something they can use (I hope) to understand the situation that put the other 2 million people in prison.

        But all in all, I agree it is a problem to focus on one particular privileged prisoner with an extraordinarily developed support system while not mentioning others who are in the same hole but without the lifelines. So I’ll put some effort into using Tim’s story as connecting work rather than just as a way to focus on him.

        (All Prisoners are Political Prisoners)

        So I have a specific request: Tacky and Nat, if you each send me a post about prisoners, prisons, plea deals, miscarriages of justice, or anything else related (or possibly unrelated), I’ll be happy to post them here as guests posts exposing the broader reality of incarceration. I think I have a lot to learn from both of you about this, and if you’d be willing to share, plenty of other people who run into this blog would be benefitted as well. Maybe we could start with a good report on Pelican Bay- Tacky, could you pick a good one? I was out of the country during a lot of the summer and am just getting back into US news (though I did see graffiti in Mexico about supporting the hunger strike…), so you could probably pick a good report better than I.

        Thanks,

        Tristan

  2. http://sketchythoughts.blogspot.com/2011/08/hungerstrike-recap-california-prisoners.html this is a great summary b y a canadian leftist of what went down. it’s a bit long though.

    http://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com/declaring-a-victory-ongoing-struggle/ this is shorter, and was written directly by the prisoners.

    thanks for doing this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 246 other followers

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: